Learn more about Shah
Shah is a Persian term for a monarch (king or emperor) that has been adopted in many other languages. It is either actually used as a princely style or to render original Near Eastern styles. It also appears in various derived titles.
 Word history
Shāh, Modern and Middle Persian Šāh (شاه), is descended from Old Persian xšāyaθiya, "king", cognate with Sanskrit क्षत्रिय (kšatriya) "dominion" and Greek krasthai "to acquire". No direct cognate of this word is known in Avestan, but the related root xši- "govern, rule" is found there.
The full title of the Achaemenid rulers was xšāyaθiya xšāyaθiyānām, "King of Kings", corresponding to Middle Persian šāhān šāh, literally "kings' king", and modern Persian shāhanshāh (شاهنشاه). In Greek this phrase was translated as "βασιλεύς τῶν βασιλέων (basileus tōn basilēōn)", "king of kings", in rank rather equivalent to Emperor. Both were often shortened to their root, Shah viz. Basileus.
From the related word kshathra "realm, province" also decends kshathrapavan, literally "guardian of the realm", which in western languages became Satrap 'governor' via the Greek and Latin Satrapes.
In English its use as title for the king of Persia is recorded since 1564, as shaw, and for long it remained common to render it in European languages by kingly rather than imperial titles. Via its Arabic form (also Shah) it was the root of the western words for chess and check.
 Ruling Shahs
 Nominal Shahs
Various Iranian monarchies, and other imitating that example, used the royal title Shah.
This has been the case in Afghanistan, but in great confusion- the style was used by local rulers, e.g. in Herat, or by the national King, by each time inconsistently alternating with other styles (for the central throne including Malik, rather equivalent Arabic for King, and Badshah, a Persian-language imperial title).
 Subsidiary use
Shah-i-Bangalah was a subsidiary title, adopted by Sultan Shamsuddin Ilyas shah (1342-1357 AD), the Sultan of Bengal who united that state (the use of shah in the name itself, as here, is not titular, and rarely significant).
Even non-Muslim dynasties could adopt this royal style. Thus Shah (or Shaha) is a title borne by the Hindu Maharajadhiraja (King of Kings) of Nepal and his male-line descendants, which was originally conferred as a title by the Muslim Sultan of Delhi on Kulananda Khan, after he made himself ruler of Kaski. Also borne by several families descended from rulers of certain Nepali vassal principalities.
The following derived or compound titles designate an even higher rank than just Shah:
In western languages, the term Shah is often used as an imprecise rendering of Shāhanshāh (meaning King of Kings), usually shortened to Shāh is the term for an Iranian monarch and was used by most of the former rulers of the Iranian empires many nationalities of Iranian origin or under cultural influence.
The term of Shah or Shahanshah has roughly corresponded to Persia since the Achaemenid Persian Empire (which had succeeded and absorbed the Mede state) or properly Iranian Empire, after its conquest by Alexander the Great transposed in Greek as Basileus ton basileon, also often shortened to Basileus.
The title is roughly equivalent in rank to a Western Emperor and is hence often translated as such in English and its equivalent in other languages. The Monarch of Persia (internally always called Iran) was technically the Emperor of the Persian Empire (later the Empire of Iran, as Iran was officially known until 1935). However until the Napoleonic era, when Persia was an enviable ally for Western powers eager to make the Ottoman Great Sultan release his hold on various -mainly Christian, European- parts of the Turkish empire, and Western (Christian) Emperors had obtained the Ottoman aknowlegdement that their Western imperial styles were to be rendered in Turkish as Padishah, the Western practice was to consider 'King of Kings' a particular but royal title,
The last Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi officially adopted the title شاهنشاه Shâhanshâh (literally "King of Kings") and in Western languages the rendering as "Emperor", during his coronation. He also styled his wife شاهبانو Shahbânu ("Empress").
- In orthodox Georgia, Giorgi III, grandson of King Bagrat III (who expelled the Turks from the Eastern provinces, threw off his allegiance to Byzantium and unifyied all Georgia, establishing its rule over the Abkhazis, Kartvelians, Ranians, Kakhetians and the Armenians,), was the first to assume the subsidiary titles of Shahanshah (like the Persian King of Kings) and Master of all the East and West. His reign, and that of his successor, his daughter Thamar the Great, are seen as the 'golden age' of Georgia; the titles of the following Georgian rulers varied significantly from reign to reign, especially while under Muslim and Russian domination, but the last enjoying the traditional titles, was "The Most High King (Mepe-Umaglesi) Irakli I, by the will of our Lord, Mepe-Mepeta ('King of Kings') of the Abkhazis, Kartvelians, Ranians, Kakhetians and the Armenians, Shirvanshah and Shahanshah and Master of all the East and West", with the style of His Majesty (or His Splendour). However after (also orthodox) imperial Russia had established a protectorate over the 'Transcaucasian' kingdom of Georgia, the Emperor recognised the following Russified styles and titles as of 24th September 1783 old style for its Hereditary Sovereign and Prince (now in fact a Russian vassal): The Most Serene Tsar (i.e. King) (reign name), by the will of our Lord, King (Tsar) of Kartli, King of Kakheti, Hereditary Prince of Samtzkhé-Saatabago, Ruling Prince of Kazakh, Borchalo, Shamshadilo, Kak, Shaki, and Shirvan, Prince and Lord of Ganja and Erivan, with the style of His Majesty, but without the now too imperial subsidiary titles.
 Shah bahadur
In the Mughal tradition, the addition of bahadur raises any title one rank, so this means something untranslatable such as 'King first class'. Yet this title was adopted as part of the full style of the former Nawab (vassal 'govenor') of Awadh (the richest remaining province in the Mughal empire, and geographically close to its Delhi capital; often Oudh in English) and Mughal 'regent plenipotentiary (de facto Viceroy) when he followed the British advice to declare himself independent from the completely weakened Mughal court- only to become the political toy of the eager coloniser. However the crucial element is his majestic full style -Hazrat Khalid, (personal reign name and titles) Shah Bahadur, Padshah-i-Oudh- is the imperial title Padishah, which could not conceivably be allowed to be assumed by a vassal.
 Related and subsidiary princely titles
 Ruler styles
- The title Padishah 'Great King' (see both articles) was also adopted from Iranians (Persians) by the Ottomans (the 'Great Sultan' was the Sunni counterpart of the Shiah Shahanshah) for their Emperor, and by various other Islamic Monarchs claiming imperial rank, such as the Indian Mughal (among them only the Ottomans would also claim the caliphate, full sovereign authority over universal (or at least Sunni) Islam, like the prophet).
- The Turkish title Hünkar is a contraction of the Middle Persian Khudavendigar, originally an epithet of semi-divine status. It must have been highly respected not to be swept away by Islam before the Ottomans could adopt it as a subsidiary title in the full style of their Great Sultan (following directly after Padishah)
- Another subsidiary style of the Ottoman Sultan Khan was Shah-i-Alam Panah 'King, refuge of the world'.
- Some Monarchs were known by a contraction of the kingdom's name with Shah, such as Khwarezmshah, ruler of the shortly mighty Muslim realm of Khwarezmia, or the more modest Azeiri Shirvanshah of Shirvan (later a modest khanate).
In the realm of a Shah (or a more lofty derived ruler style), a prince of blood were logically called Shahzada as the term is derived from Shah using the Persian patronymic suffix -zade or -zada, "son, descendant"; see "Prince" article for other uses of the suffix. However the precise full styles can differ 'creatively' in the court traditions of each Shah's 'kingdom'.
- Thus in Oudh, only Sons of the Sovereign Shah bahadur (see above) were by birth-right styled Shahzada (personal title), Mirza (personal name) Bahadur, though this style could also nominatim extended to individual grandsons and even further relatives; other male descendants of the sovereign, in the male line were merely styled Mirza (personal name) or (personal name) Mirza.
Furthermore the title was also used for princes of the blood of a ruler who used an alternative royal style, e.g. the Malik (Arabic for King, so equivalent) of Afghanistan In the Ottoman dynasty of imperial Turkey, it was part of two styles:
- male descendants of a Sovereign in the male line: Daulatlu Najabatlu Shahzada Sultan (given name) Hazretleri Effendi; except the crown prince (style Daulatlu Najabatlu Vali Ahad-i-Sultanat (given name) Effendi Hazlatlari), who was however addressed as Shahzada Hazratlari (or Shahzade Hazretleri) 'Imperial Highness'.
- sons of Imperial Princesses: Sultanzada (given name) Bey-Effendi.
This could even apply to non-Muslim dynasties, e.g. the younger sons of the ruling Sikh Maharaja of Punjab (in Lahore; a Maharajadhiraja): Shahzada (personal name) Singh Bahadur, while the heir Apparent was styled Tika Sahib Bahadur
- The corruption Shahajada 'Shah's son', taken from the Mughal title Shahzada, is the usual princely title borne by the grandsons and male of a Nepalese sovereign (a Hindu Maharajadhiraja; but cfr. Shaha above), in the male line.
- For the Heir to a 'Persian-style' Shah's royal throne, more specific titles were used, containing the key element Vali Ahad, usually in addition to Shahzada where his junior siblings enjoyed this style.
 Other princely compound
- the title of Shah-i-Buland Iqbal and a seat on a gold throne by the side of the Emperor 's throne were awarded on 3 February 1655 to Shahzada Dara Shikuh, eldest son of the Padshah Khurram Shah Jehan I (d. 22 October 1666 ), at various times Subahdar (governor) of Allahabad, Punjab, Gujarat, Multan and Kabul; yet he did not succeed as he was put to death on the night of 30-31 August 1659 in Delhi
 Other uses
As many titles, the word Shah is also often used in names, without a political or aristocratic meaning.
- Shah is a common Indian surname (family name), especially in the Gujarati language and Kutchi language. In India it is used by Hindu, Jain and Muslim communities. In Jain and Hindu community the Shah surname normally represents the Bania caste. See Shah (surname)
- Shah is also short for Shahryar.
- Shah is the surname of a Gujarati sect in India.
 See also
- Aryamehr Pahlavi additional imperial title
- Iranian monarchy
- Mirza, also a princely style, but generally awarded to further relatives of the ruler then Shahzada
 Sources and references
- RoyalArk - select present countries
- WorldStatesmen - here Iran; seee ach present country
- Etymology OnLinear:شاه